Perbandingan Kondisi Kemampuan Awal dan Akhir Peserta Pelatihan Realistics Mathematics Education Smart Camp 2021

Main Article Content

Farida Nursyahidah
Irkham Ulil Albab
Muhtarom Muhtarom
Arif Wibisono

Abstract

Learning mathematics using traditional setting make students only memorize formulas and are good at counting without knowing the meaning behind the formula or calculation. As a result they cannot use mathematics in problem solving. Good quality in learning mathematics can only be realized by teachers who master the right mathematical approach. Realistic Mathematics Education Smart Camp is a 32 hours model training activity to facilitate mathematics teachers who are members of the city/district Mathematics council to improve the quality of mathematics learning through training in making progressive learning designs through the RME approach. This article compares how the condition of teachers related to their mathematical abilities in solving problems before and after participating in the training. Mathematics teacher show that their ablity in beginning were still lay on third level Bloom Cognitive hierarchy. They master calculating and applying formula in certain mathematics application. However, in the real context, they failed to use mathematics. After given progressive workshop, they were able to apply mathematics in any condition. They literated in using mathematics to solve daily problem. From this comparison, it can be concluded that the RME Smart Camp training has a significant role in improving the ability of teachers to prepare mathematics lessons that foster meaningful understanding using students' abilities.

Article Details

How to Cite
Nursyahidah, F., Albab, I. U., Muhtarom, M., & Wibisono, A. (2022). Perbandingan Kondisi Kemampuan Awal dan Akhir Peserta Pelatihan Realistics Mathematics Education Smart Camp 2021. Pelita: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 2(1), 14-26. https://doi.org/10.51651/pjpm.v2i1.124
Section
Articles

References

Albab, I.U., Hartono, Y & Darmawijoyo, D. (2014). Kemajuan belajar siswa pada geometri transformasi menggunakan aktivitas refleksi geometri. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 33(3).

Albab, I.U., Murtianto, Y.H., Nugraha, A.E.P. & Sumarno, S. (2021). Strategi Sekolah Dikdasmen Kabupaten Kendal dalam Menghadapi Pembelajaran di Era New Normal, Pelita: Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat, 1(2), 49-54.

Billiar, K, Hubelbank, J, Oliva, T, & Camesano, T. (2014). Teaching STEM by Design. Advances in Engineering Education, 4(1).

Campos, N., Nogal, M., Caliz, C. & Juan, A. (2018), Using simulation and serious games in STEM education. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Civil Engineering Education, EUCEET.

Coxon, S., Dohrman, R. & Roberts, G. (2015), CREST-M: Children using Robotics for Engineering, Science, Technology and Math: Explore Measurement with Lucia & John: Strawberry Harvest (Vol. 1). Maryville University Center for Access and Achievement.

Duffin, J. (2010). Using virtual manipulatives to support teaching and learning mathematics. First North American GeoGebra Conference, 18.

Dwyer, F. (2010). Edgar Dale's cone of experience: A quasi-experimental analysis. International Journal of Instructional Media, 37(4), 431-438.

Fajar, D.S., Wahyuni, I., & Santi, D.P.D. (2019). Desain bahan ajar berbasis kemampuan koneksi matematis siswa SMP pada kelas VII. Jurnal Edukasi dan Sains Matematika (JESMAT), 5(2), 125-136.

Flores, M.M. & Franklin, T.M. (2014). Teaching Multiplication with Regrouping Using the Concrete-Representational-Abstract Sequence and the Strategic Instruction Model. Journal of the American Academy of Special Education Professionals, 133, 148.

Ganguli, R. (2019). A pedagogical example for stem using the glauert inflow equation, mathematica and python’. In AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum (p. 0867).

Hunt, A.W., Nipper, K.L. & Nash, L.E. (2011), Virtual vs. Concrete Manipulatives in Mathematics Teacher Education: Is One Type More Effective than the Other?, Current Issues in Middle Level Education, 16(2), 1-6.

Kennard, J. (2007). Outdoor Mathematics. Mathematics Teaching Incorporating Micromath, 201, 16-18.